Maintainability of writ petitions against interdepartmental communications of the government that do not finally determine any right or obligation of the parties | Amarchand Mangaldas
In the recent case of State of Orissav M/s Mesco Steels Ltd (decided on 6 March 2013), the Supreme Court examined the question of whether a writ petition (initiated under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) filed by the respondent company against the state government of Orissa was premature, inasmuch as the same was …